| Orange County Residents Continue to View the County More Positively
 Than the State, Both Overall and Economically Continuing a long pattern, more Orange County residents say the county is "heading in the right direction" than those who say the state of California is.
  
                    
                   June 26, 2006  Continuing a long pattern, more Orange County residents say  the county is “heading in the right direction” than those who say the state of  California is, according to a recent survey conducted by Cal State Fullerton’s  Center for Public Policy and the Orange County Business Council.  Similarly, county residents rate the state of the county  economy better than they do that of California’s  economy in general. Sixty-six percent of respondents told interviewers that the  county was headed in the right direction, compared with 40 percent who said the  same about California.  (See Table 1.) Eight percent said the state of the California  economy was “very good,” with 21 percent saying the state of the Orange County  economy was “very good.” “These findings, with respect both to the respondents’  overall views as well as the more specific matters of the state of the economy,  indicate again that Orange County residents tend strongly to view local  conditions positively and statewide conditions less so,” said Phil Gianos,  professor of political science at Cal State Fullerton and director of the CSUF Center  for Public Policy. “We’ve seen this in previous surveys. I’ve come to call it  the Lake Woebegone Effect. The county, relative to the state, is always rated  more highly.”                   “As Orange   County is a powerful  economic engine for the state, the Orange County Business Council is pleased to  see overall positive perceptions of those polled for the county. Orange County’s  high level of consistent job creation and remarkably low levels of unemployment  for a sustained period of time have fostered widespread optimism about the  future of the Orange   County economy,” said  Lucy Dunn, president and CEO of the Orange County Business Council. “Wages and  household incomes are growing faster here than for the state and nation. Yet,  as partners in a competitive global economy, we’d like to see a more positive  perception of the state’s economic future.” For the first time in these surveys, we also asked  respondents for their views on the state of the economy. (See Table 2.) As with  their more general views on the direction of the county and the state, our  respondents were strikingly more likely to rate the economy of the state poorly  than they did that of the county. “These figures are, of course, especially  important as we enter an election campaign for governor,” Gianos said. “Both  major party candidates will have to pay a good deal of attention to the state  of the economy, which is very much on the minds of voters.” When we asked our respondents to assess whether they would  be better or worse off financially one year from now, 36 percent told us they  expected to be better off; 48 percent told us their circumstances would be  about the same; and 16 percent said they expect to be worse off. Table 1 Attitudes on the Direction of Orange County and the State of California
 (percent saying the county [or California] is moving in “the right direction”)
 
                    
                      |  | California | Orange County |  
                      | June 2006 | 40% | 66% |  
                      | September 2005 | 40% | 70% |  
                      | April 2005 | 44% | 71% |  
 Table 2 Attitudes on Orange  County and California Economies (percent saying current conditions are “very good”)   California  economy                     8% Orange   County economy          21% 
 The current survey was  conducted for the CSUF Center for Public Policy / Orange County Business  Council team by the Social Science Research Center (SSRC) at California State   University, Fullerton  (SSRC).  The SSRC director is Gregory  Robinson.   Interviews  were conducted between May 3 and May 22. The  total sample size was 486. Telephone interviews were  conducted utilizing Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) equipment  and software.   The CATI system is a  sophisticated information-gathering protocol that contributes to the accuracy  of data and to preserving the random nature of the sample.   A draft survey instrument  was provided by the Center for Public Policy and refined by the Social Science  Research Center for comprehensiveness, flow, length and factors that influence  respondent cooperation and interest.   Sample design and  technical assistance with data analysis was provided by the SSRC. The confidence  interval (popularly known as the margin of error) for items in this survey,  calculated conservatively, is plus or minus 4.54 percent.   
 
                     
                      | Media Contacts: | Phillip Gianos, Ph.D., Director,  Center for Public PolicyProfessor  of Political Science
 657-278-4713
 (714)  267-4337 [ cell ]
 Wallace Walrod,  Ph.D., OCBC Research
 (949)  794-7237
 
 |  « 
                    back to News Front
 |